Administrative Offices
Office of Information Technology return to Connecticut Community Colleges home page

Overview

Committees

ITPC
ISRAAC
ISPO Advisory Group
ISPO Working Groups
Report Incident
CCC Policies & Procedures
News
Commnet News
Alerts
Security Resources
Training
9
Contact Us
CT Community Colleges - Information Security - Virus and Vulnerability History
 Virus and Vulnerability History

There is no way to completely protect your computer against all security vulnerabilities. The best approach is to keep up to date on virus scan engines, virus definition files and any security patches available for your system and applications. This applies to all computers, whether production or non-production.

The following information details the history of viruses and vulnerabilities that have affected the CCC networks. Each entry contains information about the virus or vulnerability and the steps needed to be taken above and beyond basic virus protection. Additional details and removal instructions can be found by following the link provided for that particular virus or vulnerability.

12/01/2004: Workstations without 8/2003 patch for RPC/DCOM vulnerability infected with virus

05/04/2004: LSASS Vulnerability and Sasser Worm

02/25/2004: Netsky.c Virus

02/11/2004: MS ASN.1 Vulnerability

01/27/2004: MyDoom Viruses (MyDoom.a and MyDoom.b)

09/11/2003: MS RPCSS-DCOM Vulnerabilities

08/18/2003: SoBig.F Virus

08/13/2003: MSBlaster/LovSan Virus

08/08/2003: MS RPC-DCOM Vulnerability

08/01/2003: IRC/Flood.cd Virus

07/16/2003: Downloader-DI Virus/Backdoor-AXJ Trojan

10/20/2002: Klez Virus


12/01/2004: Workstations without 8/2003 patch for RPC/DCOM vulnerability infected with virus

Windows XP and Win2K machines that were not up to date with the Microsoft RPC/DCOM patch from August 2003 were infected with a new variant of a virus. The latest cumulative update patch for Microsoft RPC/DCOM (MS04-012) released in April 2004, includes the patch that should have been on ALL workstations and servers as of August 2003 as stated in the "virus history" entry from 9/11/2003 . Over the last two weeks, unpatched machines at 5 of our colleges were infected by this virus that took advantage of this vulnerability. There is no reason any machine should not have had this patch in place.

The virus spread by scanning the network for other vulnerable machines on port 135. The virus also installed an anonymous FTP server on the workstation and also sent an email containing the IP address of the infected machine to an Internet user. Therefore, we can identify infected machines by 1) the email connection to the Internet address; 2) the network scan for port 135 and 3) the open port for FTP.  Machines identified as infected were blocked at the college router until they were determined to be clean of infection.

Please note: If a machine is being blocked at the router - it should NOT be moved to another IP to attain Internet access for any reason! The IP of the infected machines are blocked for a reason and should only be allowed network access once the machine is free of infection. This is to reduce further spreading of the virus to the rest of the network.

The virus appeared to have 2 parts: scan.exe: a scanning executable that scanned for other vulnerable machines on the network and syshost.exe: the anonymous FTP server. The actual virus name is still unclear - it appears to be a combination of possibly two known viruses: Tumbi Worm a.k.a. Francette and Exploit-DcomRPC.

For infected machines, the machine needs to be updated with the latest anti-virus DAT file and scanned. This will remove the scanning executable scan.exe.  To remove the FTP server, all instances of the process syshost.exe need to be killed and the file needs to be removed. After a reboot, using the "netstat -ano" for Windows XP machines or "netstat -an" for Win2K machines,  you need to verify that port 21 is no longer listening. After the machine is cleaned and unblocked at the router, all critical Microsoft updates need to be applied via Windows Update.

All windows servers and workstations need to apply the patch listed in the MS04-012 security bulletin ASAP to protect against any malicious program that takes advantage of this vulnerability. NOTE: This patch is included in "Windows Critical Updates" so if you are up to date with your machine's "Windows Critical Updates" then your machine is patched against the vulnerability. We have made the patch available from our internal download site.

You can verify that this update is installed by going to "Add or Remove Programs" in the Control Panel and looking for "Windows XP Hotfix - KB828741".

NOTE: Security bulletin MS04-012 supersedes MS03-039.

05/04/2004: MS LSASS Vulnerability and Sasser Worms

A new worm has hit the Internet that takes advantage of a vulnerability in Microsoft's LSASS (Local Security Authority Service Server) by exploiting a buffer overflow condition. Information on the vulnerability was released last month. The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with system privileges. The vulnerability exists in several operating systems including Windows XP, 2000, 2003 and  NT 4.0.

All windows servers and workstations need to apply the patch listed in the MS04-011 security bulletin ASAP to protect against any malicious program that takes advantage of this vulnerability. NOTE: This patch is included in "Windows Critical Updates" so if you are up to date with your machine's "Windows Critical Updates" then your machine is patched against the vulnerability. If your machine is not up to date, it is  not recommended that all machines go to Windows Update, instead download the patch from the link above to a single machine on your college network, then copy the patch from that machine and update the rest of your machines.

The Sasser worm (and it's variants) is not an email borne virus, it is a worm that spreads without any user interaction by scanning randomly for vulnerable machines on port 445 (MS SMB). When a vulnerable machine is found, it exploits the buffer overflow and downloads the worm from the attacking machine. Then the infected machine starts to scan randomly for other vulnerable machines.

The CCC network was hit yesterday with a couple of infected machines, but ACLs on our routers and the firewall prevented the worm from spreading rapidly past the local network. As of this morning, all colleges appear to have at least some unpatched systems that are infected with the worm. Since a single infection at a college could infect all unpatched machines and possibly cause severe network slowdowns, it is imperative to get ALL machines patched immediately. Also, all machines need to make sure their anti-virus DAT files are up to date and any infected machines are scanned and cleaned.

WARNING! There are also reports of a FAKE email that appears to be from an anti-virus company and claims to have a cleanup tool for the Sasser worm attached. It is NOT a cleanup tool for the worm, it is in fact a copy of the Netsky virus.  All regular precautions should be adhered to with respect to any unknown attachments.

02/25/2004: Netsky.C Virus

The CCC network was hit with this virus shortly before the anti-virus companies released the virus DAT file that would have protected us against the virus. We are aware that the virus did make it into our network via email and users did open the infected attachment. This is because the virus appeared to come from legitimate, known email accounts and appeared to be legitimate file names.

As with previous viruses, the netsky.c virus contains it's own email server which propagates the virus to others in your address book. The virus used attachments of type .pif and .scr (common with other recent viruses) to spread the virus as well as .exe and .com file types. These attachments often arrive in ZIP archives.  Stated in the 08/18/2003 report of the SoBig.F virus, .pif and .scr files are already being blocked at the Exchange Server. In addition to blocking all .pif and .scr files, the virus is now blocked by anti-virus software located on the Exchange Server as well as at the Internet Mail Gateways.

In addition to spreading via it's own SMTP server, it also spreads by copying itself to mapped drives that have "shar" in the name.

With most recent viruses, the virus writers are using various techniques to convince the end user to open the attachment. Such as forging "FROM" headers to come from email addresses you may know, using convincing subjects, attachment names or body text. This was a good example of one of them. Most times, the anti-virus companies update their DAT files BEFORE the virus hits our network and users don't usually see viruses in their mailboxes. It's always good practice, for any email with an attachment - to never open any attachment that you are not expecting.

Along the same lines, if you receive email stating that you received a virus but it was cleaned or deleted, do not notify the sender that they are infected with the virus. The netsky.c virus forges the "FROM" headers similar to the Klez virus and the infected person is not the person who sent you the message. See the 10/20/2002 report of the Klez virus for more info on forging "FROM" headers.

02/11/2004: MS ASN.1 Vulnerability

Microsoft just released information on a serious vulnerability in the ASN.1 library that, if exploited, an attacker would have complete control over an affected system. The attacker could change, delete or view data, install programs or create new accounts with full privileges. The vulnerability exists in several operating systems including Windows XP, 2000, 2003 and  NT 4.0.

As of right now, there are no known exploits for this vulnerability, but since ASN.1 is a standard for many applications and devices, there are many avenues for attack. Experts believe that this vulnerability could have as much destructive potential as the Blaster worm.

All windows servers and workstations need to apply the patch listed in the MS04-007 security bulletin ASAP to protect against any malicious program that takes advantage of this vulnerability.

We have made the patch available from our internal download site if you are having difficulties getting to the Windows Update site.

01/27/2004: Mydoom Viruses (Mydoom.a and Mydoom.b)

The original Mydoom virus was identified on Tuesday. A variant of the virus, MyDoom.b, was identified on Wednesday. MyDoom.a and MyDoom.b are very similar and are both addressed in this article.

Both viruses contain their own mail server in order to propagate the virus, a backdoor component that would allow an attacker to connect to the infected machine and a denial of service (DoS) payload against specific well known Internet companies intended to strike at the beginning of February. This DoS is intended to bring down these companies web servers by overwhelming them with a flood of requests.

As with several previous viruses, .pif and .scr files are used to attempt to spread the virus as well as .exe, .bat and .cmd file types. These attachments often are arriving in ZIP archives.  Stated in the 08/18/2003 report of the SoBig.F virus, .pif and .scr files are already being blocked at the Exchange Server. In addition to blocking all .pif and .scr files, both viruses are blocked by anti-virus software located on the Exchange Server as well as at the Internet Mail Gateways.

Both viruses attempt to trick the recipient into opening the infected attachment by looking like a legitimate bounced email.  The body of the message contains a message similar to:

  • The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment.
  • The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment.
  • Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.

This is just an attempt to have you open the infected attachment.  There is no "partial email" or "problem with mail delivery" in this case. Just delete these messages if you have it. Even if you recognize the sender of the message, do not notify the sender that they are infected with the virus. The Mydoom viruses forge the "from" headers similar to the Klez virus and the infected person is not the person who sent you the message. See the 10/20/2002 report of the Klez virus for more info on forging from headers.

09/11/2003: MS RPCSS-DCOM Vulnerabilities

Three (3) vulnerabilities have been announced in all MS Windows operating systems that could allow an attacker to either compromise and gain control of the system or cause a DoS (Denial of Service) on the system. All windows servers and workstations need to apply the patch listed in the MS03-039 security bulletin ASAP to protect against any malicious program that takes advantage of these vulnerabilities.

NOTE: Security bulletin MS03-039 supersedes MS03-026

08/18/2003: SoBig.F Virus

As with the Downloader-DI virus, .pif files are used to attempt to spread this virus. Stated in the 07/16/2003 report of the Downloader-DI virus, .pif files are being blocked at the Exchange Server. In addition to blocking all .pif files, the SoBig.F virus is blocked by anti-virus software located on the Exchange Server as well as from the Internet Mail Gateways.

When either a .pif file is dropped or the SoBig.F virus is found in an email, the email message continues onto the recipient of the email but instead of containing the .pif file, it contains a message indicating the attachment has been removed. This results in CCC users receiving tons of these messages and in some cases filling up users mailboxes.

Even though the SoBig.F virus uses one of 9 specific subjects (i.e. "Your application", "Thank you!", "Re: Details") we cannot filter these messages based on those subjects due to the possibility of filtering out legitimate email with those same subject lines.

It is recommended to just delete these harmless messages. Do not notify the sender that they are infected with the virus. The SoBig.F virus forges from headers similar to the Klez virus. See the 10/20/2002 report of the Klez virus for more info on forging from headers.

NOTE: The SoBig.F virus infected the State DOIT (Department of Information Technologies) computer systems and subsequently the CCC network was inundated with a massive amount of emails notifying CCC users that messages sent from DOIT users were infected with the SoBig.F virus but have been cleaned. Measures have been put in place to reduce these messages from certain DOIT addresses, which considerably reduced the number of SoBig.F viruses coming into our network.

08/13/2003: MSBlaster/LovSan Virus

The MSBlaster virus was a serious virus that hit the CCC network as well as made news headlines across the world. The MSBlaster virus takes advantage of Windows systems that were not patched against the MS RPC-DCOM vulnerability detailed in the 08/08/2003 report.

In early afternoon on the 13th, the SDC began to see increased network traffic coming into the SDC LAN. Upon investigation, symptoms of the MSBlaster virus were seen (numerous attempts to access various IP addresses on ports 135, 4444) at the majority of our colleges. These infected machines were attempting to access servers in the SDC. The good news is that all of the servers in the SDC were patched and protected from this virus. The bad news is that due to the MASSIVE number of attempts, the SDC LAN became unresponsive (i.e. we were DoS attacked by our college LANs).

At 2pm, we shutdown the Internet and WAN connections in order to restore operation to the SDC LAN. To prevent the same DoS attack from resurfacing, we placed the following ACL (Access Control List) on all of the college WAN routers:

  • Deny all connections to port 135 (except the Exchange Servers)
  • Deny all connections to port 4444

Once these measures were taken, we were able to re-enable the Internet and WAN connections by 3pm and begin to monitor the ACL for infected college machines.

08/08/2003: MS RPC-DCOM Vulnerability

A serious vulnerability has been announced in all MS Windows servers and workstations that could allow an attacker to compromise a machine and gain control of it. All windows servers and workstations need to apply the patches listed in the MS03-026 security bulletin to protect against any malicious program that takes advantage of this vulnerability.

08/01/2003: IRC/Flood.cd Virus

We had a case of a college "test" computer infected with this virus that scanned the network looking for vulnerable machines. A few test machines were found to be vulnerable but anti-virus stopped the virus from infecting the machines. Apparently the non-production college computer was also vulnerable but did not have anti-virus software installed to prevent the virus from spreading. It is IMPERATIVE to have all computers, whether production or non-production, follow the same basic virus protection.

07/16/2003: Downloader-DI Virus/Backdoor-AXJ Trojan

The downloader-DI virus appeared in many CCC mailboxes as spam from various banking institutions (i.e. Wells Fargo, Citibank, E-Loan). The email carried an infected attachment of type .pif. When the user tried to execute the infected attachment, the user's PC attempted to download the Backdoor-AXJ trojan from a site on the Internet.

Based on information found about .pif files, the System Data Center blocked all attachments that are .pif files and recommended to all colleges to do the same. The System Data Center also blocked all outbound connections to the Internet site that is used in the virus to download the Backdoor-AXJ trojan. This gives us the ability to alert the college IT staff of possibly infected machines based on computers attempting to  go to this site.

10/20/2002: Klez Virus

Did you know? Sometimes responding to someone who sent you a virus will not actually notify the REAL person who sent you the virus. The Klez virus is becoming prevalent on the Internet. This virus masks the true sender of the email message making it appear to come from an innocent email address. 

Here's how it works: Once a person is infected with the Klez virus, the virus compiles a list of email addresses found all over the person's computer. It will then blast out email containing the Klez virus to various people found on this list making the email appear to come FROM users found on the list as well. So if you are a recipient of the Klez virus, the person in the From: field did not send you the virus. If you responded to these people, they may reply to you that they did not send you a virus. And they would be correct...


    © Copyright Connecticut Community Colleges 61 Woodland Street Hartford, CT 06105 860-244-7600