Introduction
Student Learning
Learning in K - 12
Arrow - This section is ON Access and Affordability

Minority Enrollment

Arrow - This subsection is ON

Operating Expenditures From State Support

Real Price To Students

Enrollment By Credit Program

Economic Development
Societal Needs
Resource Efficiency
Return to Title Page
Return to Title Page
Operating Expenditures From State Support
Common Core Performance Indicator
Total state appropriations including general fund fringe benefits and state support for student financial aid as a percent of total educational and general expenditures excluding depreciation.
Performance Improvement Goal
Are Connecticut Community Colleges affordable?
Data Analysis

Connecticut Community Colleges receive 60% of their current funds operating budget from State support, which includes about 57% from unrestricted General Fund resources (block grant, tuition freeze and fringe benefits) and about 3% from restricted state grants and scholarships. Other support comes primarily from student tuition and fees; federal grants; and private gifts.

In recent years, the percent of expenditures supported by State resources has declined from a high of 67%. This compares with a Board of Governor’s tuition policy, which calls for a State share of between 65-70% for community colleges.

Expenditures (In Millions of Dollars)
  State Support Other Support Total Current Funds Percent From State Support
Fiscal Year 2002 181.9 103.6 285.5 63.7%
Fiscal Year 2003 181.3 117.6 298.9 60.7%
Fiscal Year 2004 175.4 129.6 305.0 57.5%
Fiscal Year 2005 200.0 137.1 337.1 59.3%
Fiscal Year 2006 214.0 144.7 358.7 59.7%

When local government support is included, total publicly funded support ratios for peer institutions average from 54% to 59%, which is in line with public support in Connecticut. Peer institutions receive a lower portion of their current funds operating budget from State support, with ratios averaging from only 26% to 43%, but they receive significantly more from local government.

These differences reflect the fact that states operate under different funding models, with many peer institutions receiving both state and local taxpayer support.

Percent of Expenditures From State and Local Support
  Fiscal Year 2002 Fiscal Year 2003 Fiscal Year 2004 Fiscal Year 2005 Fiscal Year 2006 5 Year Average
All CCCs 63.7% 60.6% 57.5% 59.3% 59.6% 60.2%
Peer Institutions' Support 58.7% 56.2% 53.8% 55.2% 56.8% 56.2%

Source: IPEDS Data and Banner Data Extracts


Percent of Expenditures From State and Local Support by College
  Fiscal Year 2002 Fiscal Year 2003 Fiscal Year 2004 Fiscal Year 2005 Fiscal Year 2006 5 Year Average
Asnuntuck 68.2% 68.2% 64.1% 68.0% 65.5% 66.8%
Northwestern CT 72.0% 71.3% 55.6% 50.5% 71.5% 64.2%
Quinebaug Valley 64.9% 63.5% 64.2% 64.2% 57.2% 62.8%
Peer Total Support 61.2% 62.4% 57.8% 58.4% 57.6% 59.5%
             
Capital 57.8% 61.0% 50.4% 55.2% 54.6% 55.8%
Gateway 62.5% 57.4% 52.8% 55.8% 60.1% 57.7%
Housatonic 59.6% 54.5% 54.7% 55.6% 55.6% 56.0%
Peer Total Support 55.2% 51.7% 48.0% 52.7% 54.1% 52.3%
             
Manchester 67.5% 58.8% 60.9% 62.9% 62.1% 62.4%
Naugatuck Valley 65.4% 64.9% 63.3% 61.2% 53.3% 61.6%
Norwalk 58.6% 53.0% 48.9% 54.2% 61.2% 55.2%
Peer Total Support 62.8% 57.2% 53.0% 56.5% 59.3% 57.8%
             
Middlesex 67.7% 68.6% 65.6% 66.7% 63.7% 66.5%
Three Rivers 69.8% 66.1% 67.1% 67.4% 65.2% 67.1%
Tunxis 59.8% 57.2% 56.2% 58.1% 57.9% 57.8%
Peer Total Support 55.5% 53.6% 56.3% 53.3% 56.4% 55.0%

Source: IPEDS Data and Banner Data Extracts